Know what the FDA thinks
"I would cry if I lost access to Rhizome"

Comprehensive and hallucination-free research
The most comprehensive AI product
Each answer cites up to 1,000 documents from 30 regulatory and clinical datasets you trust across 6 markets.
1. General FDA Position and Guidance
FDA encourages sponsors to submit RWE/RWD when methods are prespecified and data quality is robust1 2 3.
Submissions are strongest when analysis plans are defined before readout, comparators are clinically appropriate, and pre-specified subgroup analyses are justified with robust sensitivity checks4 5 6.
FDA also weighs endpoint consistency, follow-up completeness, and protocol deviations when deciding how much evidentiary weight to assign RWE findings.
2. Examples Where RWE/RWD Was Used
- Supportive evidence in rare disease contexts7 13 14
- Inclusion was limited when comparability was weak.
- FDA cited concerns when external controls introduced residual confounding18 19.
More trustworthy than anything else
We had no hallucinations reported in 2025. Our fine tuning, grounding, and inference-time checks keep them at bay.
2.2 RWE Considerations in Labeling Decisions
FDA may consider RWE as supportive evidence when data sources are reliable and protocols are pre-specified.
Key limitations included heterogeneity in baseline disease severity, missingness in follow-up windows, and potential selection bias across cohorts.
Sponsors are encouraged to align SAPs, endpoint definitions, and sensitivity analyses with FDA feedback before final submission.
Easy fact checking
Each statement has a citation. Each citation jumps directly to a specific page from an authoritative source.
Leveraged by large pharma, independent consultants, and everyone in between
Last time we did this research, we spent weeks. Rhizome found the answer immediately.
VP of Regulatory Affairs at Clinical-Stage BiotechChetan idk what kind of magic you all did here, it's so good!
VP of Regulatory Affairs at Commercial BiotechI want this. I'm really impressed by the quality of the information and the level of detail.
Head of Combination Devices Regulatory AffairsI spent two days with Rhizome and it was a firehose. Manually, it would have taken a month.
Director of Regulatory Affairs at Top-5 PharmaIn regulatory work, speed is nice but accuracy is non-negotiable. I appreciate a tool that prioritizes getting it right.
Principal Regulatory Affairs Consultant10 minutes of work can accomplish what would have taken weeks.
Device Engineer at Pharma Company
Simple pricing, for everyone
Project
Immediate, flexible access
$400/mo
- All of our FDA premarket, postmarket databases
- All of our EMA datasets: EPARs, Guidelines, CTIS, etc.
- Guidance, clinical trials, and SBOAs for 4 other regions
- Pay with a credit card
Professional
Best-value single-seat access
$3,500/yr
- All of our FDA premarket, postmarket databases
- All of our EMA datasets: EPARs, Guidelines, CTIS, etc.
- Guidance, clinical trials, and SBOAs for 4 other regions
- Pay with a credit card
Business
Scale your research
$20,000/yr
- Annual access for 5 seats
- All of our professional-tier databases
- Monthly office hours
- Invoice-based pricing
Enterprise
Comprehensive global access
Custom
- Annual access for 5 seats
- All business-tier benefits
- All regulatory, clinical DBs in South Korea, China, Japan
- Biweekly office hours
